PROUT

PROUT
For a More Progressively Evolving Society
Showing posts with label economic democracy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label economic democracy. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 5, 2016

Minimum Requirements and Maximum Amenities for Life

Human needs are ever constant, though indeed include necessarily basic needs germane to contemporaneous life.  Through changes in time, place, and person, such basic necessities may fluctuate, while in a progressively evolving society, such amenities escalate, building upon prior amenities and often transcending them through subtler means.  PROUT endeavors towards participation, as well as production and distribution to escalate in optimal capacities and processes, and rational distribution in a rational manner, not to compromise any realm of society by any means in the evolution of such progress.  

Guaranteeing basic amenities of life are imperative for a society to prevail; prevention of such availability and growth of amenities are unconscionable, are crimes against humanity.  

Progressive Utilization promotes assuring the purchasing capacity for acquiring the basic necessities for all, a broader concept, disposition, and principle than state capitalism, stipend socialism, chasing the crumbs of trickle-down economics, or stealing, or anarchy.  At any moment, the correct approach within any country or community may not be exactly the same between one another, while exercising the principle will be the same.  

Principles in PROUT are of such a core nature that they have lasting import throughout the continuation of life and society, while what forms of implementing such core principles vary from time, place and person(s).  This also facilitates PROUT from accommodating dogma or superstition to become part of societal culture.

Today there may be a call for $15 or $20 an hour as a just and living wage, whereas such numbers may not be practical as time passes, thus, Progressive Utilization operates on the broader principle, to remain steady, that "everyone should be guaranteed the purchasing capacity for basic necessities of life", of which should always be in the increase for all, optimizing the felicities of life.  



Building anything on humanistic lines requires a foundation of real love and affection for humanity.  A truly benevolent society will never come into being under the leadership of those who are solely concerned with profit and loss.  Where love is paramount, the question of personal loss or gain does not arise.  The basic ingredient for building a healthy society is simply genuine love; how then is it possible to establish such a society through coercion or legal compulsion?
— P R Sarkar  



by P R Sarkar  Founder or PROUT

There are many attractions in society, and it is the nature of human beings to run after these attractions.  Communism exploited this human tendency by promising to give equal wealth to all.  But the mundane resources in the world are limited, so is it possible to provide equal wealth to all?  No, and the attempt to do so is nothing but a dazzling ostentation.  Now communism has met its end.  Communism was nothing but a “bogusism” – a mere ostentation of verbose language and nothing else. 
Rather than trying to give equal wealth to all, the proper approach is to ensure that everyone is guaranteed the minimum requirements of life.  As the income of people increases, the radius of their minimum requirements should also increase.  Just to bridge the gap between the more affluent people and the common people, we have to incease the minimum requirements of all.  In addition, the maximum amenities should be provided to meritorious persons to enable them to render greater service to society.  This should be done by setting aside some wealth for those with special qualities, but the provision of the maximum amenities should not go against the common interest.
However, something more can be added.  Besides increasing the maximum amenities of meritorious people, we also have to increase the maximum amenities available to common people.  Meritorious people will earn more than common people, and this earning will include their maximum amenities.  But the common people should not be deprived of maximum amenities, so there should be efforts to give them as much of the maximum amenities as possible.  There will still be a gap between the maximum amenities of the common people and the maximum amenities of the meritorious, but there should be constant efforts to reduce this gap.  Thus, the common people should also receive more and more amenities.  If maximum amenities are not provided to common people, no doubt there will be progress in society, but there will always remain the scope for imperfection in future.  What constitutes both the minimum requirements and the maximum amenities should be ever increasing.  This idea is a new appendix to PROUT.
If the maximum amenities of meritorious people become excessively high, then the minimum requirements of common people should be immediately increased.  For example, if a person with special qualities has a motor bike and an ordinary person has a bicycle, there is a balanced adjustment.  But if the person with special qualities has a car, then we should immediately try to provide the common people with motor bikes.
There is a proverb which refers to plain living and high thinking, but what is plain living?  Plain living eighty years ago was not the same as it is today, so plain living changes from age to age.  The standard of value also varies from age to age.  Thus, both the minimum requirements and the maximum amenities will vary from age to age, and both will be ever increasing.  If this were not so, there would be no economic progress in society.
So, our approach should be to provide the minimum requirements of the age to all, the maximum amenities of the age to those with special qualities according to the degree of their merit, and the maximum amenities to the common people as well.  The minimum requirements of the age as per their money value plus the maximum amenities of the age as per their money value are to be fixed and refixed, and fixed again and refixed again, and so on.  In this way you must elevate the standard of the people – you must go on elevating their standard of living.  

The Amenities of Life

The amenities of life are those things which make life easy.  The word “amenity” comes from the Old Latin word amenus which means “to fulfill the desire” or “to make the position easy”.  Amenities mean physical and psychic longings.  Whatever will satisfy the physical and psychic longings of the people will be the amenities of the age.  Common people should be favored with maximum amenities.  For example, previously people used to dig a well to get drinking water, and then they carried the drinking water to their houses.  Later water tanks were constructed, and now drinking water comes through pipes.  In this way the amenities of life have increased and life has become easier.  Though the aim is to get water, the system of getting it has become more effortless and more convenient.
Take another example.  Suppose school children receive the minimum requirements of life.  If they are provided with free snacks, this amenity will be over and above the minimum requirements.  Again, in most trains there are first and second class compartments.  First class passengers already get special facilities, but if free tea or coffee is given to the passengers in the second class compartments, it will be considered an amenity.
More and more amenities will have to be provided to the common people with the progress of society.  This process will generate the impetus to collect and utilize more and more resources, and the proper utilization of the collective resources will elevate the standard of living of both the common mass and the meritorious people.
As the need for the minimum requirements is fulfilled and the supply of the maximum amenities increases, the struggle for daily subsistence will gradually decrease and people's lives will become increasingly easy and enjoyable.  For this reason PROUT guarantees the minimum requirements and the maximum amenities to all.
The root vidh prefixed by su and suffixed by ac and t´a´ equals suvidha´ which means “the pabulum asked for”.  Kuvidha´ means “the pabulum not asked for”.  If you are travelling by train and you see someone take a snack of delicious food, you will have a natural urge or longing to enjoy the same delicacies.  This is a natural longing for physical pabulum.  Those things which your body wants are the natural amenities.  Natural amenities include all the longings of nature.  They include all natural physiological longings such as urination, defecation and eating when one is hungry.  Common people should be provided with more and more natural amenities to make their lives easy.
They should also be provided with more and more super-natural amenities.  Common people experience much stress and strain – they should be freed from this tension.  For example, the rural people of India always worry about their crops.  If the rains are late or if they fail, paddy production will suffer; if the climate is too cold or not cold enough, the winter crop will be adversely affected.  The common people should be freed from all these stresses and strains.  This can be achieved through the provision of super-natural amenities which can be developed artificially through science and technology.  For example, better agricultural techniques and the construction of small-scale dams to conserve water and improve irrigation can help relieve poor rural people of their stresses and strains.  Even simple techniques can increase crop yields.  For instance, if the smoke from burning wood chips is made to pass through a field of mustards seed, the flowers of the mustard seeds will bloom immediately and increase the production of the crop.
We should provide common people with both natural and super-natural amenities according to the physical capacity, the psychic capacity and the technical capacity of the state.  This approach will ensure that human beings get enough amenities so that their lives become satisfying and congenial.
The minimum requirements must be guaranteed to all human beings, and under the environmental conditions concerned – that is, the existing environmental conditions – there should be maximum amenities.  You should satisfy the thirst for physical and psychic longings – for physical and psychic pabula – under the concerning conditions.  So maximum amenities are to be guaranteed to all under the environmental conditions concerned, which means keeping in view such factors as the temporal, topographical, geographical, social and psychic conditions.
What is the difference among surroundings, atmosphere, and environment?  “Surrounding” means “everything physical, either directly physical or psycho-physical, that surrounds.”  “Atmosphere” means “the nature of different expressions in the surroundings, such as water, air, air pressure, temperature, etc.”  “Environment” means “that which controls the characteristic of inanimate and animate beings.”
One age will go and another will come, and human longings will also change.  In one age a particular type of breakfast is accepted as the standard, and in the next age it will be considered substandard.  Today people eat bread and butter, but according to the standard of the next age people may eat fried rice or sweet rice.  Thus, the maximum amenities of life should be guaranteed to each and every individual, and their standard should be continuously elevated.
The jurisdiction of maximum amenities will go on expanding with the progress of human beings.  Human beings are marching ahead, and their longing for different psycho-physical pabula is also increasing.  The minimum requirements of the age must be guaranteed, and the maximum amenities must also be guaranteed.  Maximum amenities must be provided in the existing environment.  
Can human thirst be fully quenched?  Can human hunger be fully satisfied?  Why is it that human thirst knows no limitations?  From PROUT we are moving to psycho-philosophy.  In the relative world human thirst cannot be satisfied.  Human beings are the progeny of the Supreme Progenitor, therefore human thirst is unlimited.  All the properties of the Supreme are ensconced in human existence, and not only in human existence, but in each and every entity of the expressed universe.  Can physical thirst, psychic thirst and spiritual thirst be quenched?  Only spiritual thirst can be quenched.  Unification of the unit with the Cosmic can quench the spiritual thirst.  The physical body has certain limitations.  It functions within very strict limitations.  The mind has a far bigger jurisdiction, but it is also limited.

Future Progress

Every system has its merits and demerits.  The demerit of this system is that as life becomes easier and easier, the physical capacity of human beings will gradually decrease. In ancient times people used to walk great distances with bare feet, carrying only a single cloth, but today people rarely move without footwear or without taking proper provisions. It is a fact that human strength will decrease in the future, but with the progress of society we have no alternative but to accept this situation.  A day will come when the eyes and the bones in the human body will become weak.  Almost all people will wear glasses and have false teeth.  In the future there will also be tremendous changes in the structure of human beings.  Human intellect will become sharper, the cranium will become larger and the nerve fibres will become more complex.  Not only will such changes occur in human beings, similar changes will occur in animals and plants too.
The African elephant has a large body and a small head and it cannot be easily domesticated.  In comparison the Indian elephant has a small body and a large head.  It is more intelligent and it can be easily domesticated.
As life becomes increasingly easy, there will be greater opportunities for intellectual pursuits.  A day will come when there will be hardly any need for human beings to work.  This may sound strange today and perhaps we might not like to hear such a thing, but that day will surely come.  Physicality will be transformed into more and more intellectuality, and intellectuality will be transformed into the culminating point of spirituality.  To move ahead from physicality to intellectuality is the Proutistic order.  It is the surest movement of human life – it is the surest movement of human destiny.
This type of movement to intellectuality will also take place in certain kinds of animals, such as dogs, monkeys and cows.  It may be that in 1,000 years monkeys will reach the stage of evolution that human beings have achieved at present.  At that time human beings will be making tremendous progress in the realms of intellectuality and intuition.  The human beings of that future age will be very sensitive.  The efferent nerves will be more active than the afferent nerves, and subtle experiences will be more common than they are now.  Today human beings seldom have subtle experiences, but in the future they will occur naturally and spontaneously.  The functional jurisdiction of the brain will also increase.  Similarly, many animals will become more sensitive and their vocabulary will increase.  With intellectual development vocabulary increases, and the number of words in a language also increases.  The functional jurisdiction of the brain of animals will increase too.
With the help of spiritual practices, the human beings of the future will increase the functional jurisdiction of their brains with accelerating speed.  People may think that they cannot make rapid spiritual progress unless the size of the brain, and hence the size of the cranium, is increased.  But this is not so because human beings can increase the jurisdiction of their thinking.
Today human beings are progressing in the realm of intellectuality.  To attain the culminating point of spirituality the human beings of today have to face less obstacles than the people of the past such as Mahars´i Vishvamitra, Mahars´i Agastya, etc.  The development of the glands and the amount of the hormone secretions is much greater than 100,000 years ago, and the glands will develop and increase their secretions by much more in the next 100,000 years.  In 100,000 years, human beings will conceive of things which are beyond the conception of the human beings of today.  These types of changes will occur within the social and economic jurisdiction of PROUT.
As human beings gradually move along the path of evolution, they will come to increasingly understand that humans are more psychic than physical.  In fact human beings are machines, but they are physico-psychic machines.  With psychic changes physical changes will also occur.  The human beings of the future will feel strange when they see the structure of the human beings of today.  Similarly, the humans of today would feel disturbed if they could see what the humans of the future will look like.
According to human psychology, people do not like to think much about the future.  Rather they prefer to dwell on the past.  The reason is that the future may or may not happen as human beings plan, so there is always a risk involved in speculating about the future.
One day the physical and psychic structure of human beings will become divine.  It may happen that human beings will not like this mundane world anymore.  They will then lose their fascination with the transitory world.  They will think that it is better to merge into Supreme Consciousness and leave the world forever.  This transformation in human psychology will come about through spiritual practices.  So I advise each human being that as long as you are alive, you should try to build yourself in a nice way, in a complete way.  But you should not only build yourselves, you should also build human society in the same way.  To achieve this you will have to take the help of PROUT.
The progressive availability of the maximum amenities of life will be guaranteed in PROUT, satisfying physical needs.  The satisfied physical needs will lessen the physical obstacles which inhibit human progress, and human beings will experience all-round development, especially in the intellectual stratum.  Human beings will get the opportunity to develop in the intellectual stratum without any hindrances.
The truth of humanity, the veracity of humanity, will go on increasing in different areas of expression.  That is why I say that there must be guaranteed minimum requirements and guaranteed maximum amenities for all human beings, and that these must go on increasing.  These amenities must be good for the physical and psychic development of human beings, or at least for one of the two.

NeoHumanistic Approach to Economics

As you know, physical pabulum is limited, so the mind continually runs from one thing to another.  This process goes on in a never ending order.  But in the realm of intuition the goal is infinite.  When aspirants come into this realm, their desires, their longings, are fully satisfied.  Thus the controlling point is the spiritual order.  Because the spiritual order is infinite, human beings have no control over it, but as the physical realm is finite, human beings can increase their sphere of activity in this realm.  The attempt to do this is a never ending process, and there are infinite permutations and combinations in this endeavor, but the latent hunger in human beings will never be satisfied in this realm.  The quest to satisfy this hunger can at best only lead to the threshold point of spirituality.
As human beings progress towards the realm of spirituality, they are helped on the one hand by PROUT, which guarantees minimum requirements and maximum amenities, and on the other hand by NeoHumanistic outlook, which removes disparities.  These two approaches help human beings in their progress and elevation.  Finally the existential faculty merges in the Supreme.
PROUT touches the threshold point of spirituality.  It also helps to lessen the obstacles in daily life.  For example, many daily commuters have to leave their homes at 6:00 a.m. and return at 10:00 p.m. to secure their minimum requirements.  But PROUT will guarantee the minimum requirements to all, so their daily burden will be lessened.
NeoHumanism also touches the threshold point of spirituality.  It helps the existential faculty reach the pinnacled state.  NeoHumanism will bring equality in the social sphere and remove all sorts of disparities, therefore human progress will be greatly accelerated.
When PROUT and NeoHumanism are established, the whole existence of human beings will become effulgent in the attainment of the Supreme.
The world is moving ahead with its merits and demerits.  The movement from imperfection to perfection is progress.  In the physical and psychic realms progress is never ending, but because everything in these realms is limited, the hunger of human beings remains unsatisfied.  In the spiritual realm, at the point of culmination, human hunger is fully satisfied.  To satisfy human hunger in the physical and psychic realms there is PROUT and NeoHumanism.  But how can human hunger be satisfied in the subtlest realm?  For this [Tantra Sadhana] philosophy and practice is there.  Movement beyond the threshold point of spirituality is beyond the scope of PROUT but within the realm of [Tantra Sadhana].  [Progressive Utilization] is a happy blending of rationality and spirituality.
The human requirements of every age must be guaranteed.  The minimum requirements must go on increasing according to the physical and psychic standard of human beings and according to the changes in climatic conditions, environment, etc.  Thus the range of minimum requirements will go on increasing according to the range of human social conditions.
At present human beings are thinking about their own minimum requirements more than about the minimum requirements of animals and plants.  A day is coming when some of the animals, if not all, will come within the realm of our social membership.  Today we say that each and every human being will get the minimum requirements.  Tomorrow we will say that the minimum requirements will also include the needs of dogs, cows, monkeys, etc.  To fulfill these requirements, there should be more and more production.
The earth is not only for human beings, it is for other living beings also.  So we will have to do something for them.  The minimum requirements and maximum amenities should also be given to animals.  Today cows, dogs and monkeys are developing; tomorrow more and more animals will be in this category.  Animals will also develop longings for different psycho-physical pabula, so they should be guaranteed minimum requirements and maximum amenities too.  We will have to do something for them also.  This is the demand of NeoHumanism, of NeoHumanistic ideas.  This demand should be fulfilled by PROUT.
According to the enlargement of human existential value and jurisdiction, psychic pabula will also increase.  There should be maximum amenities for one and all, with more longing for physico-psychic objects of enjoyment.  These amenities should be increased for the entire social order.  There cannot be any full stop, any comma or any semi-colon in this progress.
Progress is never ending.  Pabulum is also never ending.  We should understand this.  There cannot be any stop in the march of human progress.  And not only in human progress, but in the physical and psychic worlds also.  Geo-sentiment will die out; socio-sentiment will disappear; socio-economic sentiment will be eradicated.  Finally a day will come when sentient sentiment will dominate.  A day will come when human beings will get the maximum amenities, then human beings will reach the zenith.  But is the provision of maximum amenities the zenith of service?  It may be looked upon as the zenith; but because circumstances change, maximum amenities change.  The provision of maximum amenities should be treated as a relative zenith point and not the supreme zenith.
So maximum amenities of life under the conditions concerned should be guaranteed, and they should go on increasing.  We should communicate this idea to the masses and encourage them to help us in our noble mission.
Whenever we are thinking of implementing a theory we should feel that we are living in the present, then we should implement the theory.  The order of Shiva was to march ahead maintaining association with present reality.  This was the order of Shiva.  Marxism completely violated this fundamental principle, which is why Marxism has been broken into pieces under the impact of the present circumstances.
Bheunge geche mor svapner ghor,
Chinre geche mor viinar ta´r.
“The intoxicating effect of my dream has been lost,
The string of my lyre has been broken.”
Suppose there is a bright lamp.  Hundreds and thousands of insects will rush towards it and get burnt.  Similarly, communism was like a bright lamp.  Marxists built castles in the air.  They propagated many tall talks but they never thought about the practical application of their socio-economic approach.  They killed many innocent people and sent countless others to concentration camps in the name of so-called ideology.  Stalin killed hundreds of thousands of people instead of helping them by providing amenities for all.  In the name of doing good for the masses he killed so many people.  This is not humanism.  Today people have kicked communism out.  In China the people recently demanded “common human liberty”.  That was considered an offence, so they were crushed.  Do not people have every right to demand common human liberty?
Whatever is feasible and practical has been said in PROUT.  Marxism built castles in the air and encouraged the people to dream a meaningless dream.  PROUT has not done this nor will PROUT do it.  PROUT will do that which is feasible and practical.
If the common people and the meritorious people are treated as the same, the capable people will not be encouraged to develop their higher potentiality.  This is the reason why the brain drain is happening in India.  When talented people leave India, they leave it for good.  Providing special amenities for those with special capabilities will stop the brain drain.
PROUT’s approach is to guarantee the minimum requirements for all, guarantee maximum amenities for all and guarantee special amenities for people with special capabilities.  This approach will ensure ever increasing acceleration in the socio-economic sphere.  The question of retardation does not arise; even the question of maintaining speed does not arise.  There must be acceleration.  Acceleration is the spirit of life, the spirit of existence, the spirit of the existential faculty.  One may not be a genius, one may simply be a member of the ordinary public, and not properly accepted or respected by all, but even then one will get the minimum requirements and maximum amenities in an ever increasing manner according to the environmental conditions concerned, according to the demands of the day.
So what is the significance of this new approach?
1) Minimum requirements are to be guaranteed to all.
2) Special amenities are to be guaranteed to capable people. Special amenities are for people of special calibre as per the environmental condition of the particular age.
3) Maximum amenities are to be guaranteed to all, even to those who have no special qualities – to the common people of common calibre.  Maximum amenities are to be guaranteed to all as per environmental conditions.  These amenities are for those of ordinary calibre – the common people, the so-called downtrodden humanity.
4) All three above are never ending processes, and they will go on increasing according to the collective potentialities.
This appendix to our philosophy may be small, but it is of a progressive nature and a progressive character.  It has far-reaching implications for the future.  I hope you will realize its impact and all its potentialities.
13 October 1989, Calcutta
Published in:
Prout in a Nutshell Volume 4 Part 17
Proutist Economics


Political Democracy can and will be fortuitous
when Economic Democracy is established.  

Explore this and other articles covering alternative economics, ethical leadership, economic democracy, and a society without the weal and woe of social and economic vicissitudes HERE  
How does PROUT compare or contrast with capitalism or communism?  Explore the answers HERE

What are essential ingredients assuring progressive sustainability bereft of the vicissitudes of economic or political predation, privation or disparity?  Learn more HERE  















.

Wednesday, October 23, 2013

Cooperative Ways to a Stronger Economy



Co-ops — just like people — can get more done together than anyone can do alone. They come in many forms, and are more common than you might imagine.  



Guest article

Our little group of a dozen families was running out of time. After meeting every weekend for three years to plan our hoped-for cohousing community, and after investing much of our savings to acquire a few acres of land, it looked as though our dream would fail. We couldn’t find a bank that would finance a cooperative.  

It was our local credit union that saved us. “You’re owned by your members? What’s
so odd about that? We’re owned by our members,” the president of the Kitsap Credit Union mused.
With that financing, we were able to build 30 affordable homes and a common house, and to make space available for gardens, an orchard, a playfield, and a tiny urban forest. In 1992, we moved into Winslow Cohousing, the first member-developed cohousing community in the United States.
Co-ops—just like people—can get more done together than anyone can do alone. The good news is that co-ops come in many forms and are more common than you might imagine. They are owned by workers, residents, consumers, farmers, craftspeople, the community, or any combination. What they have in common is that they circulate the benefits back to their member-owners, and these benefits ripple out to the broader community. As Marjorie Kelly explains, cooperative forms of ownership allow the well-being of people, the planet, and future generations to take priority over profits for shareholders and executives.
This is an exciting moment for cooperatives. A growing disillusionment with big banks and corporations is sparking interest in economic alternatives, and new opportunities are opening up:
• The United Steelworkers and other unions are exploring worker-ownership as a means to assure stable, living-wage jobs that can’t be outsourced to low-wage regions.
• Communities seeking alternatives to profit-driven corporate health insurance are forming health care co-ops.
• Hundreds of thousands of people who “moved their money” from Wall Street banks to local banks and credit unions now have a say in how their money is used.
• Consumers are turning to co-ops like Equal Exchange for ethically produced goods, and Equal Exchange, in turn, supports co-ops made up of farmers and producers in some of the world’s poorest regions.  
These cooperatives can be powerful forces for change. Vancity, Canada’s largest credit union, targets its investments to local enter- prises that have positive impacts. It divested its holdings in Enbridge due to concerns about the proposed Northern Gateway pipeline. And it adopted a living wage policy that applies to its own employees and to service providers.
Cooperative structures can strengthen an economy. For example, Italy’s Emilia Romagna region, where about a third of the economy is cooperative and has far less inequality. Most people there can find living wage jobs, and quality of life is high.
Last year, Winslow Cohousing celebrated its 20th year, and the grown sons and daughters of the early members returned to share what it meant to them to grow up in a community, surrounded by love and support.
My hope? That many more children have the opportunity to grow up in cooperative spaces; that more adults get the respect and empowerment that comes from working in cooperatives and buying from co-ops; and that over time, diverse forms of democratic ownership displace predatory capitalism as the foundation for our economy.
This article first appeared here

Sarah van Gelder wrote this article for How Cooperatives Are Driving the New Economy, the Spring 2013 issue of YES! Magazine. Sarah is executive editor of YES!
Political Democracy can and will be fortuitous
when Economic Democracy is established.  

Explore this and other articles covering alternative economics, ethical leadership, economic democracy, and a society without the weal and woe of social and economic vicissitudes HERE  
How does PROUT compare or contrast with capitalism or communism?  Explore the answers HERE

What are essential ingredients assuring progressive sustainability bereft of the vicissitudes of economic or political predation, privation or disparity?  Learn more HERE  

Friday, June 21, 2013

Population Growth and Control -- Is Overpopulation Depleting Our Potentials?



PROUTist Economics

Population Growth and Control


P.R. Sarkar, Founder of PROUT
The socio-economic environment of society today is extremely restless and disturbed.  In this abnormal environment population growth has been projected as a menacing threat to the existence of human society, but in fact this sort of propaganda is nothing but an evil conspiracy engineered by vested interests.  No problem is greater than the human capacity to solve it.  Like all problems confronting humanity, the problem of population growth should be tackled and solved in a proper way.  
In the natural course of evolution, birth and death maintain the continuity of the never ending flow of creation.  Every day, with the birth of babies, the parents and the other family members naturally enjoy great happiness.  But it is a matter of sorrow that there are some people in the government or other spheres of public life who consider the increase in the birth rate a curse on the society.  This negative attitude is definitely a blot on the human race, which has achieved a degree of intellectual development and scientific knowledge.  

Population Growth

The theory that population increases at a geometric rate while food production increases at an arithmetic rate is completely defective.  Such a situation can only occur in an imbalanced economic system.  
Is the population problem really a natural problem?  The population problem should be considered in the context of two vital factors – the availability of food and the availability of space.  Today human beings have sufficient means to manage their food.  The earth is abundant enough in food resources to feed many times more than the present population.  Due to lack of coordinated cooperation, collective effort, a proper ideology and sound planning, society has been fragmented into many belligerent groups and sub-groups, and rich and poor nations have been created.  As a result of this fissiparous tendency, society is presently incapable of producing enough food to meet human requirements.  The tragedy is that even though there are enough resources to supply nutritious food to all the human beings on the planet, due to the defective socio-economic systems, an efficient method of distribution has not been developed.  
Moreover, there is no shortage of living space on the planet if the existing space is properly utilized.  Because the earth has been balkanized due to so many arbitrary social, economic and political restrictions and the pervasive influence of evil dogma, people are unable to tackle problems in a natural way.  If there were maximum utilization and rational distribution of all natural resources, pressing socio-economic problems could be easily solved.  
It is a law of nature that a mother is provided with sufficient breast milk to feed her newly born baby.  In the same way nature has generously provided sufficient resources to meet the food and other essential requirements of all human beings.  People need to
utilize these natural resources in a proper way.  Shortages of food or space cannot be blamed on nature.  These problems are essentially the results of the mistakes made by human beings.  
It is a fact that the population of the world is rapidly increasing, and consequently many people have become frightened.  In capitalist countries there are sufficient reasons for such fear.  In these countries an increase in the population means a corresponding increase in the poverty of the people.  But there is no reason for such fear in a collective economic system.  In the event of shortages in food and accommodation people will collectively convert barren land into arable land, increase agricultural production by scientific methods and produce food by chemical processes using the potentiality of earth, water and air.  And if this earth loses its productivity, then human beings will migrate to other planets and satellites and settle there.  
If people living in capitalist countries voluntarily adopt birth control methods to avoid economic hardship, perhaps we should not criticize them.  But it should be mentioned here that using birth control methods which deform the bodies of men and women or destroy their reproductive powers forever cannot be supported, because this may cause a violent mental reaction at any moment.    

PROUT’s Solution

Under the present socio-economic conditions, PROUT advocates a comprehensive, clear-cut policy to tackle the population problem.  According to PROUT, population growth will automatically find a natural level if the following four factors exist in society:  
1) There should be economic liberty in society so that people may get a nutritious diet.  In Scandinavia, for example, the purchasing capacity of the people is high and they enjoy a good standard of living.  Because of this they do not face the problem of overpopulation.  
2) Everybody should have the right to enjoy sound health.  If people have a healthy body and mind their glandular system will remain balanced, and they can easily transform their physical energy into psychic energy and their psychic energy into spiritual energy.  Through this effort of channelizing the mind in a spiritual direction, the baser mental propensities are easily controlled.  
3) People should be free from unnecessary mental worries and anxieties.  When one suffers from mental agonies continually, the mind naturally indulges in baser physical enjoyment to get rid of that unwanted condition.  When mental agonies disappear, human beings will enjoy peace of mind and be able to assimilate subtle ideas.  
4) The intellectual standard of humanity will have to be elevated.  With intellectual advancement human beings will develop their all-round psychic potentiality and can easily evolve their psycho-spiritual potentiality.  Through continuous effort human beings will be able to attain the supreme stance, merging their individual unit existence into Cosmic existence.  
Thus, the population problem is not just an economic problem – it includes economic, biological, psychological and intellectual aspects.  
Today people give more importance to the political than to the bio-psychological and economic aspects of population growth.  
The theory that population increases at a geometric rate while food production increases at an arithmetic rate is completely defective.  Such a situation can only occur in an imbalanced economic system. In a progressive and balanced economic system no such problem will exist.

Collective Economy

It is completely wrong to propagate the idea that a rapidly increasing population will affect the collective economic structure.  Today capitalists are trying to check population
growth by propagating birth control because an increasing population is detrimental to capitalism.  In a collective economic structure there will be no need to support birth control. Rather, an increasing population will help in the production of the essential commodities.  
Good varieties of seed, fertile land, adequate nourishment, light, air and water are all essential for good reproduction in both the plant and animal kingdoms.  In this respect human beings are no different from other creatures.  In human society the selection of suitable males and females is desirable for reproduction of a high order.  Until human beings are produced in scientific laboratories, it will be detrimental to society if this matter is neglected.  
If people of sublime intelligence and brilliance reproduce more offspring, it will be very beneficial for society.  The responsibility for nurturing and bringing up these children will have to be taken by the society or the government.  Similarly, it will be harmful for society if mentally deficient, naturally delinquent or insane persons produce many children.  In fact, society will be benefited by the permanent destruction of their reproductive capacity, providing this does not cause any harmful reaction.  
Science has reached such a stage that it can usher in a new era.  It can produce synthetic food in the form of tablets to help solve the food problems of the world.  A single food tablet can be sufficient to provide sustenance for a whole day, so we need not fear population increases.  Future generations will spend more of their time and energy on subtle psychic and spiritual activities, so their demand for physical food will decrease.  
Through oceanographic research abundant food resources have been discovered within the ocean and on the sea bed.  With the application of science and technology we can harness these resources to meet the challenge of the food problem.  The crisis faced by society today indicates that humanity is not encouraging the maximum utilization and rational distribution of the world's potentialities.  Science today is being used to develop increasingly destructive weapons of war rather than for benevolent and constructive purposes.  
Society will have to adopt a collective economic system for maximum production and economic security in order to control accumulation; ensure the rational distribution of collective wealth through a well-knit cooperative system; implement decentralized socio-economic planning; and secure the maximum utilization of all types of mundane, supramundane and spiritual potentialities.  So far society has not adopted such an approach so it has been unable to solve the food problem.  
Instead, certain inhuman birth control practices have been forcibly promoted.  Not only are such practices detrimental to a healthy human body and mind, they cause physical deformity, disturbances and misunderstandings in family life, and mental derangement and debility.  Those inflicted with such psychic ailments lose the courage to face adversity in life and the power to fight for social justice.
Imposing a fear of population growth is nothing but a cunning conspiracy by vested interests to misguide people and exploit society.  Optimistic people throughout the world will have to unite and raise their voices against such a heinous conspiracy, and work together to construct a just and benevolent society.
1981, Calcutta, from Proutist Economics  


Political Democracy can and will be fortuitous
when Economic Democracy is established.

Explore this and other articles covering alternative economics, ethical leadership, economic democracy, and a society without the weal and woe of social and economic vicissitudes HERE
How does PROUT compare or contrast with capitalism or communism?  Explore the answers HERE
What are essential ingredients assuring progressive sustainability bereft of the vicissitudes of economic or political predation, privation or disparity?  Learn more HERE

Wednesday, May 22, 2013

PROUT’s Rational Banking System


PROUTist Economics

guest article

Cooperatives

By Trond Overland


Modern banking emerged during the Italian Renaissance.  The idea behind it was ancient:  To make money out of lending money.  

The present situation

Today the money lender has become the master of all trades; giant banks control everything under the sun.  Do they work in the interests of the people?  The answer is a resounding "No!"  
The main reason for the continuing recessions and depressions all over the world today is that vast deposits of money are not being released to those who require resources.  In the words of P.R. Sarkar, “the intrinsic demonic greed of banks has been allowed to jeopardize the life of common people.”(1)  
“Banks must not allow unwise administrators or governments to print monetary notes indiscriminately without reserving the proportionate amount of bullion in their treasuries.  It destroys the very life of society.  It leads to widespread inflation, which in turn jeopardizes internal trade and commerce as well as foreign trade and barter.  Even if there is abundant production in a country, the common people do not benefit from it.  The rich become richer and get more scope to continue their merciless exploitation.”(2)  

PROUT’s Proposals

Basically, money is a means of exchange.  For instance, if you have something that I require I may spend money in order to get it from you.  
I could also offer you something other than money that may be of interest to you.  Exchange of something other than money, such as goods and services, is called barter trade.  
A micro-economic example of barter trade:  I paint your house, you do my accounts.
A macro-economic example:  Bangladesh exchanges jute and hide exports for food imports.  
It may be noted here that barter trade excels under certain conditions.  On one hand, barter between countries works best at present between industrially underdeveloped – financially poor – countries with a large surplus of raw materials.  As they have no means to invest in refining industries under the present global exploitative regime, they should exchange raw materials in order to procure minimum necessities.  
On the other hand, the exchange of services between private persons would work very well where no government tax is levied on private income.  The abolition of income tax will to a great extent remove the problem of black money and bring about a welcome moral change in the population.  
Global capitalism does not encourage barter trade but wants to retain all trade within its exploitative speculative dollar-based paradigm.  PROUT encourages both types of purchase – using money or by barter – wherever they may serve people’s needs.(3)  

Money value increases with mobility

Money is not meant for piling up purchasing capacity but for paying expenses.  Spending money is the natural thing to do; accumulation is unnatural to the point where it becomes a mental disease.  Macro-economically, the accumulation of money is a dangerous socio-economic course to the point where it leads to large-scale depression; where we are today.  
The more money changes hands, the greater is its economic value.  The value of money increases with its mobility.  The motivation of PROUT’s banking system is therefore to keep money rolling.  
Apart from seeing to it that money is kept in circulation, banks should not act on their own behalf and turn into huge profit-making machines.  They should instead serve their community and remain directly associated with particular productive local endeavors.  

An economy of the people, not of banks

This is a natural idea:  Whenever people join in some productive effort they will soon need somewhere to deposit their earnings, a place where they can administer their common economy.  If no suitable means for deposit exists, the natural thing for them to do would be to form a cooperative bank themselves.  
People may need to borrow, as well, for both individual and collective needs.  PROUT’s cooperative banks will serve as both savings and lending institutions.  A cooperative bank may take a large loan from another bank or the government to purchase modern equipment and construct dams, barrages and shift or lift irrigation facilities to increase production, etc.(4)  
Under PROUT the banking system will have to be managed by cooperatives.(5) Only the government-controlled central or federal bank should have a greater reach by way of guaranteeing the currency.  
In conclusion, the mission of banks under PROUT is to keep money in motion and not become stagnant pools of personal wealth.  PROUT’s banks are non-profit cooperative organizations where ideally the balance is zero after all expenses are met.  

The Gold Standard

Financial circumstances are changing fast.  For instance, the last vestiges of the gold standard were thrown out by the Nixon administration some 40 years ago, and the gold standard has been ridiculed ever since.  The reason for this undue mudslinging is that pinning a currency to gold (“gold standard”) does not allow for free speculation.  
Today, as the global speculative system is in chaos and about to end in catastrophe, the gold standard is staged to make a return.  The price of gold has already risen phenomenally.  This proves that people in general accept gold as a basic guarantee for financial stability.  
PROUT supports the gold standard.  The main role of the central bank should be to guarantee the currency in measures of physical gold held by that bank.  Central banks must be ready to pay citizens the amount of gold represented by the currency.  This is the proper hedge against large-scale inflation.  The gold-standard protects against speculative bubbles.  

Psychology

The gold standard is more a question of psychology than physicality.  People view gold as the most precious commonly available thing.  
In the same way, the entire field of socio-economy is about physicality as well as psychology.  For instance, the present financial system is ridden by greed.  From a collective perspective the problem of unbridled greed is first a physical one, then a psychological one.  
First society has to find ways and means to stop and control the disease in a physical way.  Thereafter, when no one suffers anymore at the hands of greedy exploiters, society will be free to think about how to cure their mental disease.  
No one should be oppressed or suppressed.  Everybody should be allowed to realize their potentialities and attain their goals in life and thereby learn to utilize all sorts of resources to a maximum.  
At present the world of banking is dominated by all-devouring colossuses that crave to be fed by public money first thing in the morning (by way of “quantitative easing”) in order to continue their existence as masters of global trade.  
In contrast, PROUT’s banking system presents a rational human approach to supplying money wherever and whenever it is needed and required.  
The mission of PROUT as a whole is to pave the way for a society where people can express their true self.  Only a socio-economic system that allows and supports people’s all-round needs, interests and dreams can be termed as truly progressive.  

Notes

(1) “Keep Money Rolling – Excerpt B”, P.R. Sarkar, 1986.  Published in PROUT in a Nutshell Volume 3, and in Proutist Economics.  Ananda Marga Publications.  Web:  proutglobe.org/2011/05/quadri-dimensional-economy
(2) “Economic Dynamics”, P.R. Sarkar.  Published in A Few Problems Solved Part 9, in PROUT in a Nutshell Part 13, and in Proutist Economics.  Ananda Marga Publications.  Web:  proutglobe.org/2011/05/economic-dynamics
(3) “Trade for Regional Self-Reliance”, Dr. Michael Towsey.  Web:  proutglobe.org/2011/09/trade-for-regional-self-reliance
“Cooperative Production – Excerpt B”, P.R. Sarkar.  Published in PROUT in a Nutshell Part 14 and inProutist Economics.
(4) “Some Specialities of PROUT’s Economic System”, P.R. Sarkar.  Published in A Few Problems SolvedPart 9, PROUT in a Nutshell Volume 3, and in Proutist Economics.  Ananda Marga Publications.  Web:  proutglobe.org/2011/06/some-specialities-of-prouts-economic-system
(5) “Economic Dynamics”, op.cit.  
Copyright The author 2012  

Explore this and other articles covering alternative economics, ethical leadership, economic democracy, and a society without the weal and woe of social and economic vicissitudes HERE
How does PROUT compare or contrast with capitalism or communism?  Explore the answers HERE