For a More Progressively Evolving Society

Wednesday, November 9, 2016

Biggest Election Fraud in US History Discovered and Exposed by Bev Harris

Uncle Joe Led the Way
Are you a ten thousandth of a person [1/10,000] or are you a whole person?  If you think you are a whole person, then shouldn't your vote count as a whole vote, a whole integer?  All it takes is one person, and perhaps a software program, such as GEMS, to make you a minuscule of yourself for someone else's presumptive prerogative to marginalize you and your vote to meet their parasitic needs.  

With GEMS voting software already in place in several states, and tens of millions of voters using them, you can bet for sure that major voting fraud in the 2016 election has occured -- not by "individual voters", but by nefarious people and enterprises in place to serve their needs at your expense.  

Humanity continues to search for 'something better' than the hysterical extremities of bifurcated systems:  left/right, Democrat/Republican, capitalism/marxism;  the homeostasis of PROUT just may be exactly what we're searching for:

Guest article

by Jon Rappoport
October 31, 2016    

The Election 'May Have Been' RIGGED!
Okay.  She finally did it.  On Monday, Bev Harris (, the great investigator of vote fraud, appeared on the Alex Jones show and laid it all out.  The GEMS vote-fraud system, “fraction magic,” the way the vote is being stolen.  Not just in theory, but in fact.  Listen to the whole interview and get the word out.  Bev’s findings are staggering.  Below the video is the original piece I did on this earlier this month.  
High Alert:  the election may still have been rigged 

Votes counted as fractions instead of as whole numbers  

…[A]mazingly, the vote-rigging system it describes has not gotten widespread attention.  The system can be used across the entire US.  

As we know, there are a number of ways to rig an election.  Bev Harris, at, is exploring a specific “cheat sheet” that has vast implications for the Trump vs. Hillary contest.  

It’s a vote-counting system called GEMS.  

I urge you to dive into her multi-part series, Fraction Magic (Part-1 here).  Here are key Harris quotes.  They’re all shockers:  

“Our testing [of GEMS] shows that one vote can be counted 25 times, another only one one-thousandth of a time, effectively converting some votes to zero.”  

“This report summarizes the results of our review of the GEMS election management system, which counts approximately 25 percent of all votes in the United States.  The results of this study demonstrate that a fractional vote feature is embedded in each GEMS application which can be used to invisibly, yet radically, alter election outcomes by pre-setting desired vote percentages to redistribute votes.  This tampering is not visible to election observers, even if they are standing in the room and watching the computer.  Use of the decimalized vote feature is unlikely to be detected by auditing or canvass procedures, and can be applied across large jurisdictions in less than 60 seconds.”  

“GEMS vote-counting systems are and have been operated under five trade names:  Global Election Systems, Diebold Election Systems, Premier Election Systems, Dominion Voting Systems, and Election Systems & Software, in addition to a number of private regional subcontractors.  At the time of this writing, this system is used statewide in Alaska, Connecticut, Georgia, Mississippi, New Hampshire, Utah and Vermont, and for counties in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin and Wyoming.  It is also used in Canada.”  

“Instead of ‘1’ the vote is allowed to be 1/2, or 1+7/8, or any other value that is not a whole number.”  

“Weighting a race [through the use of GEMS] removes the principle of ‘one person-one vote’ to allow some votes to be counted as less than one or more than one.  Regardless of what the real votes are, candidates can receive a set percentage of votes.  Results can be controlled.  For example, Candidate A can be assigned 44% of the votes, Candidate B 51%, and Candidate C the rest.”  

“All evidence that [rigged] fractional values ever existed [in the GEMS system] can be removed instantly even from the underlying database using a setting in the GEMS data tables, in which case even instructing GEMS to show the [rigged] decimals will fail to reveal they were used.”  

“Source code:  Instructions to treat votes as decimal values instead of whole numbers [i.e., rigging] are inserted multiple times in the GEMS source code itself; thus, this feature cannot have been created by accident.”  

A contact who, so far, apparently wishes to remain anonymous states the following about the history of the GEMS system:  

“The Fractional vote [rigging] portion traces directly to Jeffrey W. Dean, whose wife was primary stockholder of the company that developed GEMS.  He ran the company but was prohibited from handling money or checks due to a criminal conviction for computer fraud, for which he spent 4 years in prison.  Almost immediately after being released from prison he was granted intimate access to elections data and large government contracts for ballot printing and ballot processing.”

I see no effort on the part of the federal government, state governments, or the mainstream press to investigate the GEMS system or respond to Bev Harris’ extensive analysis.  

It’s not as if media outlets are unaware of her.  From, here is an excerpt from her bio:  

“Harris has been referred to as ‘the godmother’ of the election reform movement. (Boston Globe).  Vanity Fair magazine credits her with founding the movement to reform electronic voting.  Time Magazine calls her book, Black Box Voting, ‘the bible’ of electronic voting… Harris’s investigations have led some to call her the ‘Erin Brockovich of elections.’ (… Harris has supervised five ‘hack demonstrations’ in the field, using real voting machines.  These have been covered by the Associated Press, the Washington Post, and in formal reports by the United States General Accounting Office…”  
So far, her analysis of GEMS seems to be labeled “too hot to handle.”  Press outlets prefer to report the slinging of mud from both Presidential candidates’ camps.  Meanwhile, the actual results of the coming elections—including Congressional races—appear to be up for grabs, depending on who controls GEMS.  

Update:  From what I understand, each state government appoints a “consultant” to manage GEMS on election night.  That person would be capable of rigging the vote.  

This article originally appeared here
Updates to November election challenges can be found here

Political Democracy can and will be fortuitous
when Economic Democracy is established.  

Explore this and other articles covering alternative economics, ethical leadership, economic democracy, and a society without the weal and woe of social and economic vicissitudes HERE  
How does PROUT compare or contrast with capitalism or communism?  Explore the answers HERE

What are essential ingredients assuring progressive sustainability bereft of the vicissitudes of economic or political predation, privation or disparity?  Learn more HERE